NASHVILLE, TN – On the last Friday of February, the Resolutions Committee of the National Association of Religious Broadcasters (NRB) published six significant resolutions in conjunction with its annual convention in Nashville.The sixth and final resolution applies to the preservation of certain inalienable rights recognized by the United States Declaration of Independence and our Constitution.The Resolution Urging the Supreme Court to Uphold Religious Liberty as a Primary and not Secondary Right was drafted in response to the case of Obergefell v. Hodges in which the SCOTUS ruled in favor of the legality of same-sex marriages. That decision, carried by a vote of 5-4, requires that “states must license same-sex marriages and recognize such licenses issued by other states.”
The Supreme Court Ruling
The Family Research Council rightly concluded that the court had no jurisdiction that would permit it to take on the role of a social policymaker. Rather than ruling on a constitution issue, the court became an arbiter of flawed human reasoning.
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in his dissenting opinion that:
“With each decision that is unabashedly based not on law, but on the “reasoned judgment” of a bare majority of this Court — we move one step closer to being reminded of our impotence.”
Justice Clarence Thomas also dissented, saying,
“The [court’s] decision (has) … potentially ruinous consequences for religious liberty.”
Samuel Alito struck a similar chord warning that:
“Those who cling to old beliefs will be able to whisper their thoughts in the recesses of their homes, but if they repeat those views in public, they will risk being labeled as bigots and treated as such by governments, employers, and schools.”
The NRB Resolution
Recognizing the onset of “potentially ruinous consequences” foreseen by Justice Thomas, the NRB resolution noted, in part, that:
“Lawsuits are arising across the nation where state or local laws that provide protection for “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” are colliding with the Free Exercise of Religion and Free Speech rights of Christian ministries, and Christian business people who find that aspects of such laws are a substantial burden on their rights of conscience and freedom of religion as well as freedom of speech.”
Therefore, the NRB urged the United States Supreme Court to:
“Resolve this tension that exists between recently created laws intended to protect the categories of sexual orientation and gender identity on the one hand and the historic and fundamental rights of free exercise of religions and freedom of speech on the other hand, by determining that religious freedom and freedom of speech are primary and not subservient liberties, and in the event of a conflict between those laws and such fundamental rights, that religious liberty and freedom of speech must prevail.”
Being a Christian and being an American are two distinctly different things. To live in America as a Christian is a blessing which, if not fully recognized, could have a tranquilizing effect on us such that we lose it by taking it for granted.
Justice Alito summed it up when he said, upon rendering his dissent,
“Most Americans — understandably — will cheer or lament today’s decision because of their views on the issue of same-sex marriage. But all Americans, whatever their thinking on that issue, should worry about what the [court] majority’s claim of power portends.”
Thank you to the board of the NRB for standing up to be heard on behalf of the faithful Christ-followers in America.
To read more news on Religious Liberty on Missions Box, go here.
- NRB, NRB Board Resolutions Speak on Internet, Ethical Standards, Presidential Invites, ‘Must-Carry,’ Local Radio Freedom, Religious Liberty
- NRB, Resolution Urging the Supreme Court to Uphold Religious Liberty as a Primary and not Secondary Right
- Family Research Council, Critical Analysis of Obergefell v. Hodges
- Fred Schilling, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States, Wikimedia Commons